We steelman the claim, then follow the evidence. Some theories were true. Most aren't. Here's how to tell the difference.
Conspiracy theories deserve serious examination — not mockery and not credulity. Some dismissed as paranoia, like MKUltra and NSA mass surveillance, turned out to be true. Others, like flat earth, have been thoroughly debunked by centuries of evidence. The difference matters. Conspirafy takes every theory seriously enough to steelman it fairly, then rigorously test it against the evidence. Every theory gets a clear verdict: confirmed, debunked, or somewhere in between.
We're not "both sides." We're pro-evidence. Every theory is examined for logical fallacies, red flags, and source quality. When a theory has been confirmed by declassified documents, we say so. When it's been debunked, we say that clearly too — with the evidence to back it up.
One confirmed, one debunked, one under investigation. Refreshed as new theories publish.
Section 230(c)(1) of the Communications Decency Act 1996 provides that no provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider. Drafted by Reps. Christopher Cox and Ron Wyden as a response to Stratton Oakmont v Prodigy (1995), it has since shielded Meta, Google, and X from liability for user-generated content. Critics — from the Knight First Amendment Institute to House Energy and Commerce Committee — argue the immunity is overbroad and enables platform censorship; defenders counter that removing it would chill free expression and destroy small platforms. Trump EO 13925 (28 May 2020) directed a review; it was revoked 21 January 2021. The Supreme Court dismissed federal-government censorship-collusion claims in Murthy v Missouri (26 June 2024) for lack of standing. The 'conspiracy' framing here is the claim that Big Tech lobbied to entrench and expand Section 230 to achieve permanent, unaccountable censorship power.
Read moreThe Piri Reis map is a genuine 1513 Ottoman world chart, one-third of which survives, that alternative-history writers claim depicts the coastline of Antarctica ice-free—proving a lost advanced or extraterrestrial civilization mapped the planet during the last Ice Age. Cartographic historians instead read the puzzling southern landmass as a distorted, wrapped rendering of South America's coast.
Read moreTikTok, owned by ByteDance (a Chinese-headquartered company), has been the subject of US government concern since at least 2019. CFIUS and congressional investigations have documented real data-collection concerns. Studies have found algorithmic differences in how sensitive political topics (Xinjiang, Tibet, Tiananmen Square) are surfaced on TikTok compared to competitor platforms. Whether these differences represent coordinated CCP propaganda operations or organic content-policy choices remains contested. The ban-and-reversal cycle through 2024-2025 reflects genuine unresolved institutional uncertainty.
Read moreExplore theories with evidence presented on all sides
Cast your vote: Believe, Skeptical, or Unsure
Join the conversation with threaded comments
Beyond the theory archive, explore the connections, history, and tools we use to fact-check.
Section 230 platform-immunity debate (1996-present)
Section 230(c)(1) of the Communications Decency Act 1996 provides that no provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider. Drafted by Reps. Christopher Cox and Ron Wyden as a response to Stratton Oakmont v Prodigy (1995), it has since shielded Meta, Google, and X from liability for user-generated content. Critics — from the Knight First Amendment Institute to House Energy and Commerce Committee — argue the immunity is overbroad and enables platform censorship; defenders counter that removing it would chill free expression and destroy small platforms. Trump EO 13925 (28 May 2020) directed a review; it was revoked 21 January 2021. The Supreme Court dismissed federal-government censorship-collusion claims in Murthy v Missouri (26 June 2024) for lack of standing. The 'conspiracy' framing here is the claim that Big Tech lobbied to entrench and expand Section 230 to achieve permanent, unaccountable censorship power.
Bush Sr Iran-Contra pardons (Dec 24 1992)
On Christmas Eve 1992, outgoing President George H.W. Bush pardoned six Iran-Contra figures: former Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger, former Assistant Secretary of State Elliott Abrams, CIA officer Duane Clarridge, CIA officer Alan Fiers, former CIA Deputy Director of Operations Clair George, and former National Security Advisor Robert McFarlane. Independent Counsel Lawrence Walsh denounced the pardons as a "cover-up," arguing they cut off his investigation before Weinberger could stand trial. A Bush VP diary entry released after the pardons revealed that Bush himself had been fully briefed on the Iran-Contra operation: "I was one of the few people that knew fully the details." Walsh's Final Report (1993/1994) accused Bush of withholding information.
American eugenics movement (1907-present)
Indiana enacted the first compulsory sterilization law in 1907, signed by Governor J. Frank Hanly. Between 1907 and 1979, approximately 70,000 Americans were forcibly sterilized across 32 states. California alone accounted for roughly 20,000 sterilizations. The Eugenics Record Office at Cold Spring Harbor — funded by Carnegie and Rockefeller — coordinated research and policy advocacy. Madison Grant's 'The Passing of the Great Race' (1916) and the Immigration Act of 1924 translated eugenic pseudoscience into federal law. North Carolina's sterilization programme continued into the 1970s; ICE detention sterilization claims emerged as recently as 2020. Reparations programmes in North Carolina (2013) and Virginia (2015) represent partial acknowledgement of state-sanctioned harm.
Piri Reis Map
The Piri Reis map is a genuine 1513 Ottoman world chart, one-third of which survives, that alternative-history writers claim depicts the coastline of Antarctica ice-free—proving a lost advanced or extraterrestrial civilization mapped the planet during the last Ice Age. Cartographic historians instead read the puzzling southern landmass as a distorted, wrapped rendering of South America's coast.
The Voting Pencil Fraud Myth
The recurring claim that polling stations hand out pencils so that the state, MI5, or a hidden 'establishment' can secretly rub out and rewrite votes. It is true that UK polling stations traditionally supply pencils and that voters may bring their own pen. But ballots are sealed, transported, and counted the same night under the direct scrutiny of candidates' agents and observers, no evidence of pencil-enabled vote-switching has ever been found, and election authorities across the UK, Canada, Australia and the US have repeatedly debunked the idea. Pencils are used for mundane practical reasons, not for tampering.
NESARA and GESARA
NESARA/GESARA is the belief that a secret law was passed that will cancel all debts, abolish the IRS, release vast hidden 'prosperity funds,' and revalue world currencies once it is finally 'announced.' It began as a real but never-introduced 1990s reform proposal that an internet writer transformed around 2000 into a conspiracy theory that has never once come true.
Get weekly deep-dives into the world's most fascinating conspiracy theories delivered straight to your inbox.
All 451 approved entries on Conspirafy, organised by category. Full index for search engines + readers who prefer browsing over searching.