Argentina Dirty War 1976–1983: State Terror, Operation Condor, and US Complicity
Introduction
At 3:21 a.m. on March 24, 1976, the military forces of Argentina deposed President María Estela Martínez de Perón in a coup carried out without a shot. The junta that assumed power — initially comprising Army Commander Jorge Rafael Videla, Navy Commander Emilio Eduardo Massera, and Air Force Commander Orlando Ramón Agosti — announced the beginning of a "Process of National Reorganisation" (Proceso de Reorganización Nacional), universally known as the Proceso.
What the junta termed a campaign against subversion was, in practice, a systematic programme of state terror that used kidnapping, torture, and murder as instruments of political control. The victims — the disappeared (los desaparecidos) — were abducted by uniformed and plainclothes security personnel, held in a network of some 340 clandestine detention centres, subjected to torture, and in most cases killed. Their bodies were typically disposed of secretly: buried in mass graves, thrown from aircraft over the Río de la Plata estuary (the vuelos de la muerte, or death flights), or burned.
Scale: CONADEP and Nunca Más
In 1983, following the return to democracy, President Raúl Alfonsín established the National Commission on the Disappearance of Persons (CONADEP). The commission gathered testimony from survivors and relatives, visited clandestine detention centres, and produced its report — Nunca Más (Never Again) — in 1984. CONADEP documented 8,960 documented disappearance cases with full testimonial records. The commission explicitly noted that actual numbers were higher; the commonly cited figure of 30,000 derives from testimony by survivors, human rights organisations — particularly the Mothers of the Plaza de Mayo (Madres de Plaza de Mayo) and the Grandmothers of the Plaza de Mayo (Abuelas de Plaza de Mayo) — and cross-referenced demographic analysis. Historians including Pilar Calveiro and Marguerite Feitlowitz have accepted figures in the 15,000–30,000 range; denialist claims that the true figure was in the hundreds or low thousands are directly contradicted by the physical evidence of mass graves, survivor testimony, and the documented scale of the clandestine detention network.
The Clandestine Detention System
CONADEP and subsequent judicial proceedings identified approximately 340 clandestine detention centres operated by the three branches of the armed forces and provincial police. The most notorious was the Navy Mechanics School (ESMA — Escuela de Mecánica de la Armada) in Buenos Aires, which processed an estimated 5,000 prisoners; fewer than 200 survived. ESMA has been converted into a museum of memory. The Army's Campo de Mayo, the Federal Police's Olimpo, and dozens of others across the country constituted a systematic national infrastructure of state terror, not isolated incidents.
The 1985 Trial of the Military Juntas
In April 1985, Argentina conducted one of the first successful prosecutions of a former military government for human rights crimes in Latin American history. The trial — conducted before civilian federal judges — resulted in convictions of five of the nine junta members tried. Former junta leader Jorge Rafael Videla received a life sentence for murder, illegal deprivation of liberty, and torture. Navy Commander Emilio Massera also received a life sentence. The convictions established as judicially determined fact the existence of the systematic disappearance programme, the torture methods employed, and the command responsibility of the junta leadership.
Operation Condor
Operation Condor was a programme of coordinated transnational repression among the military regimes of Argentina, Chile, Uruguay, Paraguay, Brazil, and Bolivia — and at different times other South American governments — that enabled the sharing of intelligence and the kidnapping, transfer, torture, and murder of political opponents across national borders. Condor operations extended to Europe, where a number of Latin American political exiles were killed.
Declassified US documents — released through the State Department's Argentina Declassification Project (initiated in the 1990s and expanded under subsequent administrations) and the National Security Archive — establish:
- US knowledge of Operation Condor and its operations
- US military and intelligence advisory relationships with participating regimes
- Henry Kissinger's awareness of and acquiescence to the Argentine junta's repression programme; a 2003 State Department declassification included a 1976 cable showing Kissinger told Argentine Foreign Minister Admiral César Augusto Guzzetti that the US "looked forward to the early restoration of normal institutional processes" but raised no objection to the ongoing dirty war
- John Dinges's The Condor Years (2004) provides the most comprehensive English-language account using declassified documents
Marguerite Feitlowitz's Documentation
A Lexicon of Terror: Argentina and the Legacies of Torture by Marguerite Feitlowitz (1998, revised 2011) provides the most detailed English-language account of the human experience of the disappearance system — the specific vocabulary the junta used, the methods of torture documented at ESMA and other centres, and the survivor testimony gathered over years of research. Feitlowitz's work is used in human rights education internationally and was central to the Argentine government's official reckoning.
Denialism and Scope-Creep Claims
Two categories of bad-faith argumentation appear in discourse about the Dirty War:
Denialist minimisation: Claims that the disappearances numbered in the hundreds rather than thousands, or that the junta was conducting a legitimate counter-terrorism campaign against armed Marxist guerrillas. The 1985 trial, the CONADEP documentation, and mass graves excavated in subsequent decades directly contradict these claims. Many of the disappeared were students, professionals, and relatives of suspected sympathisers — not armed combatants.
Scope-creep overclaims: The documented US complicity in Condor and the Argentine junta does not establish that the US designed or operationally directed the disappearance programme. The programme was conceived and implemented by the Argentine military. US support — through intelligence sharing, the School of the Americas training programme, and political acquiescence — was morally significant complicity, not operational authorship.
Documentation, Accountability, and the Evidentiary Record
The 1984 CONADEP report Nunca Más documented 8,961 confirmed cases of forced disappearance, supported by individual testimonies, forensic evidence, and cross-referencing of detention records. CONADEP was explicit that its count represented confirmed cases only and that the actual total was likely higher; credible historians and human rights organisations have placed the broader death toll in the range of 9,000 to 30,000. The 1985 Trial of the Juntas translated this documentation into criminal accountability, convicting former Generals Videla and Viola among others on charges that included homicide, torture, and unlawful deprivation of liberty. Subsequent declassification waves of US State Department cables in 2002, 2016, and 2019 confirmed that US diplomats possessed contemporaneous awareness of systematic killings. The 2019 tranche in particular included operational-level detail on coordination between Argentine security services and their US contacts, reinforcing the Operation Condor evidentiary record assembled in prior waves of litigation.
Legacy and Continued Accountability
Argentina has conducted the most sustained judicial reckoning with military-era crimes of any country in the world. Following the re-opening of prosecutions after the invalidation of the 1987 amnesty laws:
- Over 1,000 convictions have been secured as of 2024
- Abuelas de Plaza de Mayo have used DNA technology to identify over 130 children who were taken from disappeared mothers and given to other families — one of the most sustained forensic human rights identification efforts in history
- ESMA has operated as a museum of memory and human rights education centre since 2004
What Would Change Our Verdict
- Discovery of additional mass grave sites and forensic confirmation of scale
- Further US declassifications on Condor operational involvement
- Identification and prosecution of remaining unindicted perpetrators
Verdict
Confirmed. The systematic disappearance, torture, and murder of an estimated 30,000 people by the Argentine military junta between 1976 and 1983 is established by the 1985 criminal convictions of junta leaders, the CONADEP Nunca Más report, extensive survivor testimony, forensic evidence from mass grave excavations, and over 1,000 subsequent convictions. Operation Condor's coordination with other South American regimes and US knowledge and acquiescence are confirmed by declassified documents. Denialist claims about scale are directly contradicted by the physical and testimonial record.
Evidence Filters15
1985 trial of military juntas: convictions confirm systematic disappearance programme
SupportingStrongThe 1985 Trial of the Juntas convicted five junta leaders — including Videla and Massera (life sentences) — of murder, illegal detention, and torture. The trial established as judicially determined fact the existence of the systematic disappearance programme and junta command responsibility.
CONADEP *Nunca Más* documents 8,960 cases with full testimonial records
SupportingStrongThe CONADEP truth commission's 1984 *Nunca Más* report documented 8,960 individual disappearance cases with full testimonial records and identified approximately 340 clandestine detention centres. The commission noted that actual numbers were higher than those for which complete documentation was available.
Declassified US cables confirm knowledge of killings and acquiescence
SupportingStrongThe Argentina Declassification Project and National Security Archive releases include cables confirming that US officials — including Henry Kissinger — were aware of the junta's repression programme and raised no objection. A 1976 cable documents Kissinger telling Argentine Foreign Minister Guzzetti that the US looked forward to normal institutional processes being restored without conditioning this on halting the killings.
Over 1,000 convictions secured in post-amnesty prosecutions
SupportingStrongAfter the 1987 amnesty laws (Punto Final and Obediencia Debida) were invalidated by the Argentine Congress and Supreme Court in 2003, prosecutions resumed. By 2024, over 1,000 individuals have been convicted of crimes against humanity related to the Dirty War, including generals, officers, and civilian collaborators.
Abuelas de Plaza de Mayo DNA identifications confirm stolen-children programme
SupportingStrongThe Grandmothers of the Plaza de Mayo have used DNA identification technology to confirm the identities of over 130 children born to disappeared mothers who were taken at birth and given to other families — a programme of child appropriation that was part of the systematic disappearance operation and has been confirmed by multiple criminal convictions.
Operation Condor confirmed by declassified documents and judicial proceedings
SupportingStrongJohn Dinges's *The Condor Years* (2004) and subsequent declassifications document Operation Condor as a real programme of coordinated transnational political assassination among South American military regimes. Argentine courts have convicted individuals specifically for Condor-related crimes.
Denialist claims about scale directly contradicted by mass grave evidence
DebunkingStrongForensic teams have excavated mass graves at multiple sites across Argentina confirming the scale of killings. The Argentine Forensic Anthropology Team (EAAF) — internationally recognised and operating since 1984 — has identified over 1,000 victims through skeletal and DNA analysis from mass grave sites.
Rebuttal
This evidence point debunks denialist claims about scale. The forensic evidence directly contradicts claims that true disappearance numbers were in the hundreds or low thousands.
US complicity is documented; US did not design or direct the disappearance programme
DebunkingThe documentary record establishes US acquiescence and advisory relationships but does not establish that the US designed or operationally directed the disappearance programme. The programme was conceived and executed by the Argentine junta.
Rebuttal
The distinction between complicity and operational authorship is analytically important and supported by the documentary record. US acquiescence at Kissinger's level is itself confirmed as documented historical fact.
School of the Americas trained officers convicted in Argentina proceedings
SupportingMultiple Argentine military officers who received training at the US Army School of the Americas (Fort Gulick and Fort Benning) were subsequently convicted in Argentine courts for crimes against humanity during the Dirty War. The training programme is part of the broader US-junta relationship documented in the declassified record.
*Nunca Más* confirms torture methods at 340 clandestine detention centres
SupportingStrongCONADEP's detailed documentation of torture methods — electric shock (*picana eléctrica*), near-drowning (*submarino*), and others — at the identified clandestine detention centres, combined with Marguerite Feitlowitz's survivor testimony research, establishes a systematic rather than ad hoc torture programme.
Show 5 more evidence points
Inflated figures above 30,000 lack primary-source support
DebunkingThe CONADEP documented count of confirmed disappearances is approximately 9,000; credible scholarly and human rights estimates of total killings reach up to 30,000 when accounting for unrecovered cases. Circulated figures of 100,000 or more are not supported by any primary investigation, official inquiry, or peer-reviewed demographic study and represent scope-creep beyond the evidentiary record.
The "30,000 Disappeared" Figure Is a Contested Estimate, Not a Confirmed Count
NeutralCONADEP (Argentina's 1984 National Commission on Disappeared Persons) documented approximately 9,000 cases with sufficient evidence; human rights organizations including Abuelas de Plaza de Mayo have argued the true total reaches 30,000 based on estimated under-reporting. Argentine courts have not adjudicated a total figure. The 30,000 number originated in political advocacy contexts (notably H.I.J.O.S.) and became culturally canonical before scholarly verification. Historians including Marcos Novaro and Luis Alberto Romero note the figure is a political-moral symbol as much as a demographic estimate. None of this diminishes the scale of the atrocity, but the range between 9,000 confirmed and 30,000 estimated reflects genuine evidentiary uncertainty, not denial.
The '30,000 Disappeared' Figure Is a Contested Estimate
NeutralCONADEP's 1984 Nunca Más report documented approximately 9,000 confirmed cases of enforced disappearance with evidentiary dossiers. Human rights organisations including Memoria Abierta argue the actual toll is higher — potentially 20,000–30,000 — accounting for cases never reported, clandestine burials, and victims from rural areas. The junta itself acknowledged far lower figures. The numeric dispute does not diminish the documented crimes but affects proportional claims about scope, systematic planning levels, and individual unit accountability used in legal proceedings.
Operation Condor's Transnational Scope Distinct from Purely Domestic Junta Claims
DebunkingWhile the Argentine junta's domestic repression is thoroughly documented, some accounts conflate Argentina's internal operations with Operation Condor's multinational assassination network. Declassified State Department cables (2016 release) confirm US awareness and limited facilitation of Condor, but also show distinct national command structures. Chilean DINA, Uruguayan OCOA, and Argentine SIDE operated semi-independently under a coordinating framework. Attribution of specific killings to "the conspiracy" versus individual national security services requires case-by-case evidentiary analysis that maximalist accounts often skip.
"Genocide" Framing Is Legally Contested in International and Argentine Jurisprudence
NeutralArgentine federal courts have issued genocide convictions under Argentine domestic law applying the 1948 Genocide Convention. However, international legal scholars debate whether the Convention's definition — requiring targeting of a "national, ethnical, racial or religious group" — encompasses politically targeted killings, which constitute the majority of junta victims. The Inter-American Court and some international tribunals have used "crimes against humanity" framing rather than genocide. This is not a denial of systematic mass murder but a legal-definitional dispute with consequences for how responsibility is assigned under international law. The factual horror of state terror under the junta is uncontested; the legal taxonomy remains genuinely contested in comparative international-law scholarship.
Evidence Cited by Believers8
1985 trial of military juntas: convictions confirm systematic disappearance programme
SupportingStrongThe 1985 Trial of the Juntas convicted five junta leaders — including Videla and Massera (life sentences) — of murder, illegal detention, and torture. The trial established as judicially determined fact the existence of the systematic disappearance programme and junta command responsibility.
CONADEP *Nunca Más* documents 8,960 cases with full testimonial records
SupportingStrongThe CONADEP truth commission's 1984 *Nunca Más* report documented 8,960 individual disappearance cases with full testimonial records and identified approximately 340 clandestine detention centres. The commission noted that actual numbers were higher than those for which complete documentation was available.
Declassified US cables confirm knowledge of killings and acquiescence
SupportingStrongThe Argentina Declassification Project and National Security Archive releases include cables confirming that US officials — including Henry Kissinger — were aware of the junta's repression programme and raised no objection. A 1976 cable documents Kissinger telling Argentine Foreign Minister Guzzetti that the US looked forward to normal institutional processes being restored without conditioning this on halting the killings.
Over 1,000 convictions secured in post-amnesty prosecutions
SupportingStrongAfter the 1987 amnesty laws (Punto Final and Obediencia Debida) were invalidated by the Argentine Congress and Supreme Court in 2003, prosecutions resumed. By 2024, over 1,000 individuals have been convicted of crimes against humanity related to the Dirty War, including generals, officers, and civilian collaborators.
Abuelas de Plaza de Mayo DNA identifications confirm stolen-children programme
SupportingStrongThe Grandmothers of the Plaza de Mayo have used DNA identification technology to confirm the identities of over 130 children born to disappeared mothers who were taken at birth and given to other families — a programme of child appropriation that was part of the systematic disappearance operation and has been confirmed by multiple criminal convictions.
Operation Condor confirmed by declassified documents and judicial proceedings
SupportingStrongJohn Dinges's *The Condor Years* (2004) and subsequent declassifications document Operation Condor as a real programme of coordinated transnational political assassination among South American military regimes. Argentine courts have convicted individuals specifically for Condor-related crimes.
School of the Americas trained officers convicted in Argentina proceedings
SupportingMultiple Argentine military officers who received training at the US Army School of the Americas (Fort Gulick and Fort Benning) were subsequently convicted in Argentine courts for crimes against humanity during the Dirty War. The training programme is part of the broader US-junta relationship documented in the declassified record.
*Nunca Más* confirms torture methods at 340 clandestine detention centres
SupportingStrongCONADEP's detailed documentation of torture methods — electric shock (*picana eléctrica*), near-drowning (*submarino*), and others — at the identified clandestine detention centres, combined with Marguerite Feitlowitz's survivor testimony research, establishes a systematic rather than ad hoc torture programme.
Counter-Evidence4
Denialist claims about scale directly contradicted by mass grave evidence
DebunkingStrongForensic teams have excavated mass graves at multiple sites across Argentina confirming the scale of killings. The Argentine Forensic Anthropology Team (EAAF) — internationally recognised and operating since 1984 — has identified over 1,000 victims through skeletal and DNA analysis from mass grave sites.
Rebuttal
This evidence point debunks denialist claims about scale. The forensic evidence directly contradicts claims that true disappearance numbers were in the hundreds or low thousands.
US complicity is documented; US did not design or direct the disappearance programme
DebunkingThe documentary record establishes US acquiescence and advisory relationships but does not establish that the US designed or operationally directed the disappearance programme. The programme was conceived and executed by the Argentine junta.
Rebuttal
The distinction between complicity and operational authorship is analytically important and supported by the documentary record. US acquiescence at Kissinger's level is itself confirmed as documented historical fact.
Inflated figures above 30,000 lack primary-source support
DebunkingThe CONADEP documented count of confirmed disappearances is approximately 9,000; credible scholarly and human rights estimates of total killings reach up to 30,000 when accounting for unrecovered cases. Circulated figures of 100,000 or more are not supported by any primary investigation, official inquiry, or peer-reviewed demographic study and represent scope-creep beyond the evidentiary record.
Operation Condor's Transnational Scope Distinct from Purely Domestic Junta Claims
DebunkingWhile the Argentine junta's domestic repression is thoroughly documented, some accounts conflate Argentina's internal operations with Operation Condor's multinational assassination network. Declassified State Department cables (2016 release) confirm US awareness and limited facilitation of Condor, but also show distinct national command structures. Chilean DINA, Uruguayan OCOA, and Argentine SIDE operated semi-independently under a coordinating framework. Attribution of specific killings to "the conspiracy" versus individual national security services requires case-by-case evidentiary analysis that maximalist accounts often skip.
Neutral / Ambiguous3
The "30,000 Disappeared" Figure Is a Contested Estimate, Not a Confirmed Count
NeutralCONADEP (Argentina's 1984 National Commission on Disappeared Persons) documented approximately 9,000 cases with sufficient evidence; human rights organizations including Abuelas de Plaza de Mayo have argued the true total reaches 30,000 based on estimated under-reporting. Argentine courts have not adjudicated a total figure. The 30,000 number originated in political advocacy contexts (notably H.I.J.O.S.) and became culturally canonical before scholarly verification. Historians including Marcos Novaro and Luis Alberto Romero note the figure is a political-moral symbol as much as a demographic estimate. None of this diminishes the scale of the atrocity, but the range between 9,000 confirmed and 30,000 estimated reflects genuine evidentiary uncertainty, not denial.
The '30,000 Disappeared' Figure Is a Contested Estimate
NeutralCONADEP's 1984 Nunca Más report documented approximately 9,000 confirmed cases of enforced disappearance with evidentiary dossiers. Human rights organisations including Memoria Abierta argue the actual toll is higher — potentially 20,000–30,000 — accounting for cases never reported, clandestine burials, and victims from rural areas. The junta itself acknowledged far lower figures. The numeric dispute does not diminish the documented crimes but affects proportional claims about scope, systematic planning levels, and individual unit accountability used in legal proceedings.
"Genocide" Framing Is Legally Contested in International and Argentine Jurisprudence
NeutralArgentine federal courts have issued genocide convictions under Argentine domestic law applying the 1948 Genocide Convention. However, international legal scholars debate whether the Convention's definition — requiring targeting of a "national, ethnical, racial or religious group" — encompasses politically targeted killings, which constitute the majority of junta victims. The Inter-American Court and some international tribunals have used "crimes against humanity" framing rather than genocide. This is not a denial of systematic mass murder but a legal-definitional dispute with consequences for how responsibility is assigned under international law. The factual horror of state terror under the junta is uncontested; the legal taxonomy remains genuinely contested in comparative international-law scholarship.
Timeline
Military junta seizes power; Proceso begins
At 3:21 a.m. on March 24, 1976, the Argentine military deposes President Isabel Perón in a coup. The junta — led by Army General Videla, Navy Admiral Massera, and Air Force General Agosti — announces the beginning of the Process of National Reorganisation. Systematic abductions begin immediately.
Operation Condor formalised among South American regimes
In June 1976, Operation Condor — the coordinated transnational repression programme among the military regimes of Argentina, Chile, Uruguay, Paraguay, Brazil, and Bolivia — is formalised. Condor enables cross-border kidnapping and murder of political opponents. US knowledge and advisory relationships are subsequently confirmed by declassified documents.
Source →Democracy restored; Alfonsín establishes CONADEP
Raúl Alfonsín is inaugurated as Argentina's first democratically elected president after the junta's collapse following the Falklands War. Within weeks he establishes CONADEP (National Commission on the Disappearance of Persons) to investigate the disappearances. CONADEP operates for nine months and produces *Nunca Más*.
Trial of the Juntas: Videla and Massera sentenced to life imprisonment
The Trial of the Juntas — unprecedented in Latin American history — concludes on December 9, 1985. Former junta leader Jorge Rafael Videla and Navy Commander Emilio Massera are sentenced to life imprisonment for murder, illegal detention, and torture. Three other junta members receive lesser sentences. The trial establishes the disappearance programme as judicially confirmed fact.
Amnesty laws invalidated; prosecutions resume
Argentina's Congress invalidates the 1987 amnesty laws (Punto Final and Obediencia Debida) that had halted Dirty War prosecutions. The Supreme Court confirms the invalidation. Prosecutions resume; by 2024, over 1,000 convictions for crimes against humanity have been secured. Forensic excavations at mass grave sites continue.
Verdict
The Argentine Dirty War (1976–1983) — systematic disappearance, torture, and murder of an estimated 30,000 people by the military junta — is confirmed by the 1985 criminal convictions of junta leaders, the CONADEP *Nunca Más* truth commission report, mass grave excavations, survivor testimony, and over 1,000 subsequent criminal convictions. Operation Condor's coordinated transnational repression and US knowledge and acquiescence are confirmed by declassified State Department documents. Denialist minimisation of the scale is directly contradicted by documented physical and testimonial evidence.
Frequently Asked Questions
How many people disappeared during the Argentine Dirty War?
The commonly cited figure of 30,000 derives from testimony by survivors, human rights organisations (including the Madres and Abuelas de Plaza de Mayo), and demographic analysis. CONADEP documented 8,960 individual cases with full testimonial records but explicitly noted that actual numbers were higher than those for which complete documentation was available. Historians including Pilar Calveiro and Marguerite Feitlowitz have accepted figures in the 15,000–30,000 range. Denialist claims that true figures were in the hundreds or low thousands are directly contradicted by mass grave evidence, forensic findings, and the documented scale of the clandestine detention network.
What was Operation Condor?
Operation Condor was a coordinated programme of transnational political repression among the military regimes of Argentina, Chile, Uruguay, Paraguay, Brazil, and Bolivia — and at different times other South American governments. Condor enabled the sharing of intelligence and the kidnapping, transfer, torture, and murder of political opponents across national borders. Condor operations extended to Europe. The programme is confirmed by declassified US documents, John Dinges's *The Condor Years* (2004), and Argentine criminal convictions of individuals specifically for Condor-related crimes.
What happened at ESMA?
The Navy Mechanics School (ESMA — Escuela de Mecánica de la Armada) in Buenos Aires was the largest and most notorious clandestine detention centre of the Dirty War. An estimated 5,000 prisoners were processed there; fewer than 200 survived. ESMA detainees were subjected to systematic torture (electric shock, near-drowning, sensory deprivation) and most were killed — many via the *vuelos de la muerte* (death flights), in which drugged prisoners were thrown from aircraft over the Río de la Plata estuary. ESMA has been converted into a museum of memory and human rights education centre since 2004.
Has the Dirty War been prosecuted?
Yes — Argentina has conducted the most sustained judicial reckoning with military-era crimes of any country in the world. The 1985 Trial of the Juntas produced the first convictions. After the 1987 amnesty laws were invalidated in 2003, prosecutions resumed; by 2024, over 1,000 convictions for crimes against humanity have been secured. Forensic excavations at mass grave sites continue, and Abuelas de Plaza de Mayo have identified over 130 children born to disappeared mothers through DNA analysis.
What role did Henry Kissinger play?
Declassified US State Department documents — part of the Argentina Declassification Project and National Security Archive releases — document that Kissinger was aware of the junta's repression programme as it began and raised no objection. A 1976 cable documents Kissinger telling Argentine Foreign Minister Guzzetti that the US "looked forward to the early restoration of normal institutional processes" without conditioning this on halting the killings. Human rights advocates and some historians characterise this acquiescence as a form of complicity; others note that Kissinger did not actively direct the junta's actions. The cable record is part of the confirmed documentary evidence.
Sources
Show 7 more sources
Further Reading
- paperNunca Más — CONADEP Report — CONADEP (1984)
- bookA Lexicon of Terror: Argentina and the Legacies of Torture — Marguerite Feitlowitz (1998)
- bookThe Condor Years: How Pinochet and His Allies Brought Terrorism to Three Continents — John Dinges (2004)
- paperArgentina Declassification Project — US State Department documents — US Department of State (2019)