Skip to main content
Conspirafy

Space & Extraterrestrial

UFO evidence, space-program myths, and the difference between secrecy and proof.

Space and extraterrestrial claims are persuasive because government secrecy is real. Area 51 exists. Roswell involved classified Project Mogul material. UAP hearings have placed unexplained aerial observations into mainstream oversight. Those facts create a wide opening for stories that go far beyond the evidence: alien bodies, reverse-engineered craft, secret space fleets, Project Blue Beam, Nibiru, and elaborate disclosure timelines.

The editorial posture should be neither ridicule nor credulity. A military witness can be sincere and still mistaken. A sensor return can be unexplained without being extraterrestrial. A classified program can exist without confirming the most dramatic interpretation attached to it. This category needs careful probability language, because readers often treat 'unexplained' as 'therefore aliens' or 'therefore cover-up.'

The Moon Landing Hoax page should remain a gold-standard debunk: lunar samples, retroreflectors, telemetry, independent tracking, rival-nation confirmation, and photographic physics all make the case stronger than any appeal to NASA alone. Roswell and Area 51 should model a different pattern: confirmed secrecy around mundane or military projects, followed by later pop-cultural elaboration.

Future gaps should prioritize claims that readers actively search for: Project Blue Beam, Nibiru/Planet X, ancient aliens, Nazca alien mummies, secret space programs, and current disclosure-adjacent narratives. These pages should identify which sub-claims are testable, which are unfalsifiable, and which rely on witnesses whose access cannot be independently verified.

Primary sources here include NASA, the National Archives, congressional hearing records, AARO reports, Air Force historical reports, astronomical survey data, and peer-reviewed planetary science. Pop-culture sources can explain why a story spread, but they should not be counted as evidence for the claim itself.

The category's public value is calibration. It can show readers that skepticism does not require denying every anomaly, and open-mindedness does not require accepting every leap. The most comprehensive site in this space will have pages that say 'this part is real,' 'this part is unproven,' and 'this part is contradicted' without collapsing those distinctions.

Reading path

Start with Moon Landing Hoax for a strong debunk. Then read Roswell, Area 51, UAP/Grusch, Phoenix Lights, and Rendlesham Forest for cases where secrecy, ambiguity, and witness testimony point in different directions.

Coverage gaps we are filling next
  • Project Blue Beam
  • Nibiru or Planet X
  • Ancient aliens
  • Nazca alien mummy claims
  • Secret space program claims
24 theories·Subscribe to Space & Extraterrestrial RSS
Space & ExtraterrestrialPartially True
Phoenix Lights (13 Mar 1997)
On the evening of 13 March 1997, two distinct aerial events over Arizona generated thousands of eyewitness reports and became one of the most widely documented mass-UFO-sighting events in American history. The first event — a V-formation of lights moving south from Henderson, Nevada through Phoenix to Tucson between roughly 8:15 and 8:30 p.m. — has been explained as five A-10 Thunderbolts flying in formation. The second event — stationary lights appearing over the Estrella Mountains south of Phoenix around 9:30 p.m. — was later identified by the US Air Force as LUU-2B/B illumination flares dropped by the Maryland Air National Guard's 175th Fighter Squadron during Operation Snowbird at Barry Goldwater Range. Governor Fife Symington III mocked the reports at a press conference but admitted in 2007 that he personally saw the formation.
8 sources4% confidencebeing upgraded
Space & ExtraterrestrialPartially True
Belgian UFO wave (29 Nov 1989 - Apr 1990)
Between November 1989 and April 1990, thousands of witnesses across Belgium — primarily in the Eupen and Wallonia regions — reported large, silent, triangular craft with bright lights at their corners. The Belgian Air Force took the reports seriously enough to scramble F-16 fighters on the night of 30–31 March 1990, and Col Wilfried De Brouwer publicly briefed the sightings in a rare military acknowledgement. The wave produced the famous Petit-Rechain photograph, long considered the best evidence of a structured craft — until 2011, when photographer Patrick Maréchal admitted it was a polystyrene model he had painted and photographed. The Society for the Study of Space Phenomena (SOBEPS) conducted two investigations but reached no definitive conclusion about the craft's origin.
8 sources3% confidencebeing upgraded
Space & ExtraterrestrialDebunked
Rendlesham Forest UFO incident (26-28 Dec 1980)
Over two nights in late December 1980, USAF airmen stationed at RAF Woodbridge and RAF Bentwaters in Suffolk reported encountering a landed or hovering unidentified craft in Rendlesham Forest. Lt Col Charles Halt later filed an official memo describing the incident, which was declassified via FOIA in 1983. Investigators Ian Ridpath and Kevin McClure subsequently identified mundane explanations: the Orfordness Lighthouse and the reentry of Soviet satellite Cosmos 749. The UK Ministry of Defence concluded in 2001 the event had 'no defence significance.' The incident is sometimes called 'Britain's Roswell.'
8 sources4% confidencebeing upgraded
Space & ExtraterrestrialPartially True
USS Nimitz Tic-Tac UAP (Nov 2004)
In November 2004, F/A-18 Super Hornet pilots from USS Nimitz Carrier Strike Group encountered an unidentified aerial object off the coast of Catalina Island, California. Commanders David Fravor and Alex Dietrich witnessed a white, Tic-Tac-shaped craft performing maneuvers inconsistent with known aviation technology. FLIR footage was captured and later released publicly in 2017. The Pentagon confirmed the existence of its Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) following a New York Times investigation in December 2017. The encounters are real and documented; whether the objects are of extraterrestrial origin remains unestablished.
11 sources4% confidencebeing upgraded
Space & ExtraterrestrialDebunked
Pascagoula abduction (Charles Hickson, Calvin Parker, 11 Oct 1973)
On the night of 11 October 1973, shipyard workers Charles Hickson (42) and Calvin Parker (19) claimed they were abducted from the banks of the Pascagoula River in Mississippi by three robotic beings who transported them aboard an oval craft for a medical examination. Sheriff James Caldwell, after interviewing the men, left them alone in a room with a hidden recorder — neither man broke their story when unobserved. Hickson subsequently passed a polygraph. No physical evidence of the encounter has been produced. The case remains one of the most-cited close-encounter reports but has no corroborating physical evidence.
11 sources4% confidencebeing upgraded
Space & ExtraterrestrialDebunked
Travis Walton abduction (Arizona, 5 Nov 1975)
On 5 November 1975, 22-year-old Travis Walton claimed he was struck by a beam of light from a UFO and taken aboard a craft while six logging crew members watched near Apache-Sitgreaves National Forest, Arizona. Walton was missing for five days. The crew initially became suspects in his disappearance. When Walton reappeared, he described an encounter with humanoid beings aboard the craft. Multiple polygraph tests were administered to crew members and Walton over subsequent years, with contested and contradictory results. The case was dramatised in the 1993 film Fire in the Sky. No physical evidence has been produced.
8 sources3% confidencebeing upgraded
Space & ExtraterrestrialDebunked
Tunguska event: 1908 Siberia meteor vs Tesla-weapon vs comet
On 30 June 1908, a massive explosion flattened approximately 2,150 square kilometres of Siberian taiga near the Podkamennaya Tunguska River. The blast, estimated at 10-15 megatons TNT equivalent, left no impact crater. Conspiracy framings — most notably that the explosion was caused by a weapon devised by Nikola Tesla — have circulated since the mid-twentieth century. Scientific investigations from 1961 through 2013, including the Anfinogenov sphere findings and Kvasnytsya nanodiamond paper, are consistent with an asteroid or comet air burst. The Tesla-weapon hypothesis has no evidentiary basis.
8 sources5% confidencebeing upgraded
Space & ExtraterrestrialDebunked
Moon Landing Stanley Kubrick Faked the Apollo Footage
A persistent Moon Landing Hoax sub-theory claims that director Stanley Kubrick filmed fake Apollo mission footage on a soundstage — often citing his 1968 film *2001: A Space Odyssey* as proof of his technical capability. Multiple independent lines of evidence refute the claim. The sustained low-gravity movement shown in Apollo footage (1/6 g for hours at a time) was technically impossible to simulate with 1960s film technology; *2001* itself used techniques that would have been immediately identifiable if applied to Apollo footage. The Soviet Union, tracking the missions and with every incentive to expose a fake, confirmed the missions. The Apollo program returned 842 lbs of lunar samples distributed to international labs. Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter photographs from 2009 onward show Apollo landing sites with hardware and tracks still visible.
12 sources99% confidencefully sourced
Space & ExtraterrestrialDebunked
Moon Landing Van Allen Belts: Apollo Astronauts Couldn't Survive the Radiation
A common sub-theory of the Moon Landing Hoax claim holds that the Van Allen radiation belts surrounding Earth make a crewed lunar mission impossible — that astronauts would have received a lethal radiation dose before even reaching the Moon. The scientific record contradicts this. NASA engineered the Apollo trajectory to minimise belt exposure, reducing transit time to roughly one hour each way through the most intense zones. Total measured doses across the missions were well within established safe limits. The physicist who discovered the belts, James Van Allen, explicitly endorsed the Apollo missions and rejected the radiation-impossibility claim.
12 sources98% confidencefully sourced