Skip to main content

The 1973 CIA-Backed Coup in Chile

Written by:James Okafor· May 12, 2026
Reviewed by:Dr. Sofia Reyes· May 12, 2026

TL;DR

Sept 11, 1973: CIA-backed coup overthrew Chile's elected President Allende, installed Pinochet. Confirmed by CIA's own documents, Church Committee, Nixon tapes. Track I + Track II operations, "make the economy scream" (Kissinger). CIA facilitated weapons for Schneider killing. Not all anti-Allende activity was US-directed — Chilean military and elites had own motives.

Analysis

Claim Map

Core claim

On September 11, 1973, Chilean President Salvador Allende died as military forces bombed the presidential palace and seized power, installing General Augusto Pinochet. Declassified CIA, State Department, and Nixon White House records confirm that the United States actively sought to destabilise Allende's government through covert operations (Track I and Track II), economic pressure, and military contacts. The CIA's own documents describe authorisation from President Nixon and National Security Adviser Henry Kissinger. The verdict is confirmed: US covert involvement is a documented historical fact, not speculation.

Documented fact

CIA Track II: authorised kidnapping/coup before Allende took office

Unsupported inference

CIA did not command the September 11 coup directly — Chilean military had independent motives

Evidence that would change this

A verdict change would require new primary records, reproducible physical evidence, or named, corroborated testimony that directly answers the disputed claim.

Current verdict

confirmed, 95% confidence

Evidence Strength Matrix

A compact map of what is documented, where the claim leaps, and what evidence affects the verdict.

Adjacent documented fact
Documented: CIA Track II: authorised kidnapping/coup before Allende took office
Unsupported: The adjacent fact does not by itself prove coordination, motive, scale, or concealment.
Counter-evidence: Declassified documents show US supported destabilisation but did not direct the coup
Verdict impact: Sets the baseline for what is real before broader claims are tested.
Claim mechanism
Documented: Any proposed mechanism must be tied to records, physical evidence, technical limits, or named procedures.
Unsupported: A mechanism remains weak when it depends on inference from coincidence, visual artifacts, or anonymous claims.
Counter-evidence: Chilean business elites, military, and middle class had independent opposition to Allende
Verdict impact: Determines whether the claim is testable or mainly narrative pattern-matching.
Verdict movement
Documented: The page states what future evidence would matter.
Unsupported: A claim does not move the verdict by repeating suspicion without new primary evidence.
Counter-evidence: Declassified CIA, State Department, and Nixon White House records confirm that the US government ran covert operations (Track I and Track II) to prevent Allende from taking power in 1970, orchestrated a multi-year destabilisation campaign including media operations and economic pressure, and maintained contacts with coup-minded Chilean military officers. CIA Track II assets facilitated the weapons used in the kidnapping and killing of General René Schneider. The verdict is confirmed for documented US covert involvement; debate continues among historians about the degree of direct CIA involvement in the September 11 coup itself.
Verdict impact: confirmed, 95% confidence

Claim Family Context

View all families

Rumor Lifecycle

How this claim moves from origin to amplification, record check, verdict, and recurrence.

1
First appearance

1973

2
Amplification

Amplification pattern still being documented.

3
Record check

CIA Track II: authorised kidnapping/coup before Allende took office

4
Verdict boundary

Declassified CIA, State Department, and Nixon White House records confirm that the US government ran covert operations (Track I and Track II) to prevent Allende from taking power in 1970, orchestrated a multi-year destabilisation campaign including media operations and economic pressure, and maintained contacts with coup-minded Chilean military officers. CIA Track II assets facilitated the weapons used in the kidnapping and killing of General René Schneider. The verdict is confirmed for documented US covert involvement; debate continues among historians about the degree of direct CIA involvement in the September 11 coup itself.

5
Recurrence risk

Often recurs through the confirmed state misconduct claim family.

Source Health

Source guideURLs complete
Sources
12/12
Credibility Mix
11 high / 1 medium / 0 low
Missing URLs
0
Latest Source Year
2021

Why this page is still being upgraded

This page is below one or more content-quality gates: missing verdict-change standard. Editors are expanding the narrative, source base, and related reading before marking the page complete.

6 min readDifficulty: 5/5Fact-checked: May 2026
Body 1475/1200 wordsSources 12/12Freshness May 2026, review Nov 2027Evidence 7 supporting / 4 counter

Declassified CIA, State Department, and Nixon White House records confirm that the US government ran covert operations (Track I and Track II) to prevent Allende from taking power in 1970, orchestrated a multi-year destabilisation campaign including media operations and economic pressure, and maintained contacts with coup-minded Chilean military officers.

1,475 wordsUpdated 13 May 2026
7 supporting4 debunking12 sources

Also Read

Browse all

What do you think?

Sign in to cast your vote.

The 1973 CIA-Backed Coup in Chile

Introduction

On September 11, 1973, the presidential palace of La Moneda in Santiago, Chile was bombed by Chilean Air Force jets. Inside, President Salvador Allende — the world's first democratically elected Marxist head of state — died. The Chilean military, led by General Augusto Pinochet, seized control of the government and imposed a dictatorship that would last seventeen years, marked by the torture, disappearance, and killing of thousands of Allende supporters and political opponents.

For decades, US government involvement in the events leading to the coup was officially denied or minimised. The sustained declassification effort that followed — spanning the 1990s and accelerating after 2000 — has rendered that denial untenable. The documents that exist now are voluminous, explicit, and drawn from the CIA's own operational files, White House tape transcripts, and State Department cables.

This page documents what is confirmed, what the documents show, and where legitimate historical debate remains.

Background: Allende and the "Threat" of Democratic Socialism

Salvador Allende won Chile's September 1970 presidential election with 36.2% of the vote in a three-way race, defeating both a conservative and a Christian Democrat candidate. His Socialist-Communist coalition, the Popular Unity (Unidad Popular), proposed nationalisation of the copper industry (then dominated by US companies Anaconda and Kennecott), land reform, and expanded social programmes.

The Nixon administration's concern was not primarily about Allende's direct threat to US security. National Security Adviser Henry Kissinger articulated the real anxiety bluntly in a staff meeting: "I don't see why we need to stand by and let a country go communist due to the irresponsibility of its own people. The issues are much too important for the Chilean voters to be left to decide for themselves." The fear was the "contagion effect" — that a successful democratic socialist government in Chile would inspire similar movements across Latin America.

Track I and Track II: The Covert Operations

Within days of Allende's September 4 election victory, the Nixon administration launched two parallel covert programs to prevent him from taking office.

Track I (CIA-directed, State Department-aware): efforts to persuade the Chilean Congress, which under the Chilean constitution was required to confirm the leading vote-getter as president, to instead choose the runner-up. CIA officers made contact with Chilean politicians and media organisations, provided financial support to opposition press, and orchestrated a propaganda campaign describing Allende's presidency as a path to Cuban-style communism.

Track II (CIA-only, directly authorised by Nixon and Kissinger, withheld even from the US Ambassador and most of the State Department): a more radical operation explicitly aimed at provoking a military coup before Allende's inauguration. CIA Director Richard Helms took handwritten notes at a September 15, 1970 meeting with Nixon that read: "1 in 10 chance perhaps, but save Chile! / worth spending / not concerned / $10,000,000 available, more if necessary / full-time job — best men we have / make the economy scream."

A key obstacle was General René Schneider, Commander-in-Chief of the Chilean Army and a strict constitutionalist who refused to sanction a coup. CIA Track II assets made contact with right-wing military figures and facilitated the supply of weapons for an attempted kidnapping of Schneider. On October 22, 1970, Schneider was shot during a kidnapping attempt and died three days later. US government documents show CIA asset payments to the groups involved. Allende was inaugurated on November 3, 1970.

The Three-Year Destabilisation Campaign (1970–1973)

After the failure to prevent Allende's inauguration, the US shifted to a sustained destabilisation strategy. National Security Decision Memorandum 93 (November 1970) formalised a policy of political, economic, and covert pressure. The documented elements include:

  • Economic pressure: the Nixon administration blocked multilateral development bank loans to Chile and pressured US allies to restrict credit, aiming to create the economic instability Kissinger described as making "the economy scream."
  • Propaganda and media operations: CIA funding of opposition newspaper El Mercurio is documented in Church Committee records. The paper ran systematic anti-Allende coverage; the CIA payments were specifically designed to prevent El Mercurio's closure.
  • Labour destabilisation: CIA assets provided financial support to striking truckers in 1972 and 1973, contributing to the economic disruption that weakened the Allende government.
  • Military contacts: CIA officers maintained regular contact with coup-minded Chilean military officers throughout 1970–1973. The precise extent of CIA advance knowledge of the September 11 coup is debated among historians, but the documented contact is not.

The September 11, 1973 Coup

On the morning of September 11, 1973, Chilean Army, Navy, and Air Force units moved simultaneously. The La Moneda palace was surrounded. When Allende refused to surrender, the Air Force bombed the building. Allende died during the assault; the official post-coup government declared suicide by self-inflicted gunshot, a finding confirmed by a 2011 forensic examination commissioned by his family.

Within days, thousands of Allende supporters, socialist and communist party members, trade unionists, and intellectuals were detained in the National Stadium. Torture centres were established across Santiago and the country. The bodies of some executed detainees were found in the Mapocho River. Pinochet's secret police, the DINA, subsequently conducted Operation Condor in coordination with other South American military dictatorships, tracking down and killing political exiles across the continent and in Europe.

An estimated 3,000 people were killed by the Pinochet regime; approximately 28,000 were tortured; over 200,000 were forced into exile.

The Documentary Record

The primary evidentiary basis for US involvement comes from the documents themselves:

  • CIA Family Jewels (1973, declassified 2007): internal CIA compilation of potentially illegal activities, references Chile operations.
  • Church Committee Report (1975): the US Senate select committee's investigation produced the most comprehensive early account of US covert activity in Chile, including Track II and the Schneider operation.
  • Peter Kornbluh / National Security Archive: the most systematic declassification effort has been led by Peter Kornbluh at the National Security Archive, whose 2003 book The Pinochet File assembles hundreds of primary documents, many declassified through his FOIA requests.
  • State Department FRUS (Foreign Relations of the United States): the official diplomatic history series includes volumes on Chile 1969–1976 containing cables and memoranda documenting US policy.
  • CIA's own retrospective history: internal CIA assessments produced in the 1970s (portions declassified) acknowledge the scope of Track II and the weapons facilitation.
  • Nixon White House tapes and Kissinger transcripts: the "make the economy scream" and "save Chile" formulations are from tape transcripts and Helms's handwritten notes, not secondary accounts.

What the Confirmed Verdict Covers — and What It Does Not

The confirmed verdict applies to the following claims:

  1. The US government actively worked to prevent Allende from taking office (Track I and II).
  2. CIA Track II assets facilitated the kidnapping attempt on General Schneider and provided weapons to the perpetrators.
  3. The US conducted a sustained multi-year destabilisation campaign including media operations, economic pressure, and labour destabilisation.
  4. CIA officers maintained contact with coup-minded Chilean military figures throughout 1970–1973.

The verdict does not confirm every maximalist version of the claim. Specifically:

  • The CIA did not plan or directly command the September 11 coup. The Chilean military planned and executed the coup independently. The degree of CIA advance operational knowledge of the specific date and methods is contested among historians. The CIA had years of contacts with coup plotters; it is not established that the CIA gave a green light or provided direct operational direction for the final assault.
  • The Chilean military and Chilean elites had independent motives. The coup's architects — Pinochet, Air Force General Gustavo Leigh, and others — were Chilean actors with their own institutional, ideological, and class interests. Attributing the coup entirely to US direction understates Chilean agency and overstates CIA operational control.
  • Not all anti-Allende activity was CIA-coordinated. Chilean business associations, landowners, some labour unions, and large parts of the Chilean middle class opposed Allende's economic policies independently of US manipulation.

Legacy and Legal Accountability

Richard Helms was convicted of perjury in 1977 for lying to the US Senate about CIA activity in Chile ("We tried to do nothing," he testified, a statement refuted by the documents). He received a two-year suspended sentence and a $2,000 fine. Henry Kissinger faced extradition requests from Spanish and French judges investigating Operation Condor; the US refused extradition. Kissinger died in November 2023 without facing judicial accountability.

Pinochet was arrested in London in 1998 on a Spanish extradition warrant for human rights crimes. He was eventually returned to Chile on medical grounds in 2000 and died under house arrest in 2006 before completing any prosecution.

What Would Change Our Verdict

The confirmed verdict for documented US involvement is well-established and not subject to revision by new evidence. The scope debates — how directly the CIA directed the final coup — remain live historical questions where new documents could refine the picture.

Evidence Filters11

CIA Track II: authorised kidnapping/coup before Allende took office

SupportingStrong

CIA Director Helms's handwritten notes from a September 15, 1970 meeting with Nixon record explicit authorisation for a coup ("1 in 10 chance perhaps, but save Chile!"), a $10 million budget, and orders to keep the operation secret from the US Ambassador. Track II was a CIA-only programme directly authorised by Nixon and Kissinger.

CIA Track II assets facilitated weapons used in Schneider kidnapping

SupportingStrong

US government documents, including Church Committee exhibits and subsequently declassified CIA cables, show that CIA Track II assets provided weapons to the Chilean right-wing group that attempted to kidnap and fatally shot General René Schneider on October 22, 1970. CIA asset payments to the group are documented.

CIA funding of El Mercurio and opposition press confirmed by Church Committee

SupportingStrong

The 1975 Church Committee report documents CIA funding of Chile's main opposition newspaper El Mercurio and other media, as part of a sustained propaganda operation against Allende. The operation ran throughout 1970–1973 and is confirmed in CIA operational cables.

"Make the economy scream" — documented economic destabilisation

SupportingStrong

Kissinger's instruction to "make the economy scream" and the Nixon administration's blocking of multilateral development bank loans to Chile are documented in State Department cables and National Security Decision Memorandum 93 (November 1970). The CIA's own retrospective history and Peter Kornbluh's National Security Archive document set confirm the economic warfare component.

Richard Helms convicted of perjury for lying about CIA Chile operations

SupportingStrong

In 1977, CIA Director Richard Helms was convicted of perjury for testifying to the Senate that "We tried to do nothing" in Chile, a statement directly refuted by the documents. His conviction is itself documentary confirmation that the CIA was actively involved in Chile operations as the documents describe.

CIA contact with coup-planning military officers documented throughout 1970–1973

Supporting

CIA cables and State Department records document ongoing contact between CIA officers and Chilean military figures planning a coup throughout the Allende presidency. The National Security Archive document set includes cables from CIA Santiago station tracking coup-minded officers.

CIA did not command the September 11 coup directly — Chilean military had independent motives

Debunking

Historians including Peter Kornbluh and Jonathan Haslam note that the Chilean military planned and executed the September 11 coup independently. The CIA had years of contacts with coup plotters but the specific operational planning for September 11 was Chilean. The degree of CIA advance knowledge of the precise date and methods is debated.

Chilean business elites, military, and middle class had independent opposition to Allende

Debunking

Chilean copper-industry businesses, large landowners, professional associations, and substantial parts of the Chilean military had independent ideological and economic reasons to oppose Allende's nationalisation and land reform programmes. Their opposition did not require CIA direction and predated CIA involvement.

Some maximalist claims overstate CIA operational control

Debunking

Popular accounts sometimes describe the CIA as having "staged" or "run" the coup directly. The documents support destabilisation, contacts, and facilitation — not direct command of the September 11 operation. The distinction matters for historical accuracy and legal accountability.

Rebuttal

This limits the maximalist framing, not the core confirmed verdict. The CIA's role in destabilising Allende's government over three years, facilitating the Schneider killing, and conducting propaganda operations is confirmed at the highest documentary level regardless of the direct-command question.

CIA labour destabilisation via trucker strikes documented

Supporting

Church Committee records and subsequent declassified documents confirm that CIA assets provided financial support to Chilean truckers during the 1972 and 1973 strikes, contributing to the economic disruption that weakened the Allende government. This element is confirmed in the documentary record.

Show 1 more evidence point

Declassified documents show US supported destabilisation but did not direct the coup

DebunkingStrong

Declassified CIA and State Department documents released in 1999-2000 under the Chile Declassification Project confirmed US covert operations including financial support for opposition media, strike funding, and "Track II" efforts to prevent Allende from taking office in 1970. The documents also show US officials had advance knowledge of coup planning but concluded the CIA did not command or direct the September 1973 coup itself — a distinction the Church Committee had also drawn in 1975.

Evidence Cited by Believers7

CIA Track II: authorised kidnapping/coup before Allende took office

SupportingStrong

CIA Director Helms's handwritten notes from a September 15, 1970 meeting with Nixon record explicit authorisation for a coup ("1 in 10 chance perhaps, but save Chile!"), a $10 million budget, and orders to keep the operation secret from the US Ambassador. Track II was a CIA-only programme directly authorised by Nixon and Kissinger.

CIA Track II assets facilitated weapons used in Schneider kidnapping

SupportingStrong

US government documents, including Church Committee exhibits and subsequently declassified CIA cables, show that CIA Track II assets provided weapons to the Chilean right-wing group that attempted to kidnap and fatally shot General René Schneider on October 22, 1970. CIA asset payments to the group are documented.

CIA funding of El Mercurio and opposition press confirmed by Church Committee

SupportingStrong

The 1975 Church Committee report documents CIA funding of Chile's main opposition newspaper El Mercurio and other media, as part of a sustained propaganda operation against Allende. The operation ran throughout 1970–1973 and is confirmed in CIA operational cables.

"Make the economy scream" — documented economic destabilisation

SupportingStrong

Kissinger's instruction to "make the economy scream" and the Nixon administration's blocking of multilateral development bank loans to Chile are documented in State Department cables and National Security Decision Memorandum 93 (November 1970). The CIA's own retrospective history and Peter Kornbluh's National Security Archive document set confirm the economic warfare component.

Richard Helms convicted of perjury for lying about CIA Chile operations

SupportingStrong

In 1977, CIA Director Richard Helms was convicted of perjury for testifying to the Senate that "We tried to do nothing" in Chile, a statement directly refuted by the documents. His conviction is itself documentary confirmation that the CIA was actively involved in Chile operations as the documents describe.

CIA contact with coup-planning military officers documented throughout 1970–1973

Supporting

CIA cables and State Department records document ongoing contact between CIA officers and Chilean military figures planning a coup throughout the Allende presidency. The National Security Archive document set includes cables from CIA Santiago station tracking coup-minded officers.

CIA labour destabilisation via trucker strikes documented

Supporting

Church Committee records and subsequent declassified documents confirm that CIA assets provided financial support to Chilean truckers during the 1972 and 1973 strikes, contributing to the economic disruption that weakened the Allende government. This element is confirmed in the documentary record.

Counter-Evidence4

CIA did not command the September 11 coup directly — Chilean military had independent motives

Debunking

Historians including Peter Kornbluh and Jonathan Haslam note that the Chilean military planned and executed the September 11 coup independently. The CIA had years of contacts with coup plotters but the specific operational planning for September 11 was Chilean. The degree of CIA advance knowledge of the precise date and methods is debated.

Chilean business elites, military, and middle class had independent opposition to Allende

Debunking

Chilean copper-industry businesses, large landowners, professional associations, and substantial parts of the Chilean military had independent ideological and economic reasons to oppose Allende's nationalisation and land reform programmes. Their opposition did not require CIA direction and predated CIA involvement.

Some maximalist claims overstate CIA operational control

Debunking

Popular accounts sometimes describe the CIA as having "staged" or "run" the coup directly. The documents support destabilisation, contacts, and facilitation — not direct command of the September 11 operation. The distinction matters for historical accuracy and legal accountability.

Rebuttal

This limits the maximalist framing, not the core confirmed verdict. The CIA's role in destabilising Allende's government over three years, facilitating the Schneider killing, and conducting propaganda operations is confirmed at the highest documentary level regardless of the direct-command question.

Declassified documents show US supported destabilisation but did not direct the coup

DebunkingStrong

Declassified CIA and State Department documents released in 1999-2000 under the Chile Declassification Project confirmed US covert operations including financial support for opposition media, strike funding, and "Track II" efforts to prevent Allende from taking office in 1970. The documents also show US officials had advance knowledge of coup planning but concluded the CIA did not command or direct the September 1973 coup itself — a distinction the Church Committee had also drawn in 1975.

Timeline

  1. Nixon authorises Track II: "Save Chile"

    President Nixon meets with CIA Director Helms and National Security Adviser Kissinger. Helms takes handwritten notes recording an explicit authorisation for covert action to prevent Allende from taking power: "$10,000,000 available, more if necessary / full-time job — best men we have / make the economy scream." Track II — kept secret even from the US Ambassador — is launched.

    Source →
  2. General Schneider shot; dies three days later

    CIA Track II assets have facilitated weapons transfers to Chilean right-wing groups planning to kidnap constitutionalist Army Commander General René Schneider to provoke a coup before Allende's inauguration. Schneider is shot during a kidnapping attempt on October 22 and dies three days later. CIA asset payments to the groups involved are documented in subsequent US government investigations.

    Source →
  3. Allende inaugurated; covert destabilisation begins

    Salvador Allende is inaugurated as President. National Security Decision Memorandum 93 (November 1970) formalises a US policy of political, economic, and covert pressure. CIA funding of El Mercurio and other opposition media begins; economic warfare campaign gets underway.

    Source →
  4. Coup: Allende dies; Pinochet takes power

    Chilean Army, Navy, and Air Force units move simultaneously. La Moneda palace is bombed by the Air Force. President Allende dies. General Augusto Pinochet takes power, establishing a military dictatorship. Thousands of Allende supporters are detained; the National Stadium becomes a detention and torture site. Operation Condor will subsequently hunt exiles across the continent.

  5. Kornbluh publishes The Pinochet File

    Peter Kornbluh of the National Security Archive publishes The Pinochet File, assembling hundreds of declassified primary documents from CIA, State Department, White House, and NSC records into the most comprehensive public account of US involvement in Chile. The book's documentary appendices remain the standard primary source collection.

    Source →

Verdict

Confirmed95% confidence

Declassified CIA, State Department, and Nixon White House records confirm that the US government ran covert operations (Track I and Track II) to prevent Allende from taking power in 1970, orchestrated a multi-year destabilisation campaign including media operations and economic pressure, and maintained contacts with coup-minded Chilean military officers. CIA Track II assets facilitated the weapons used in the kidnapping and killing of General René Schneider. The verdict is confirmed for documented US covert involvement; debate continues among historians about the degree of direct CIA involvement in the September 11 coup itself.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is US involvement in the 1973 Chile coup confirmed or a conspiracy theory?

It is confirmed. The CIA's own documents, Nixon White House tape transcripts, Richard Helms's handwritten notes, the 1975 Church Committee report, and the State Department's Foreign Relations of the United States volumes all document the US covert operations. Richard Helms was convicted of perjury in 1977 for lying to the Senate about CIA activity in Chile. The CIA's role in destabilising Allende's government over three years, facilitating the Schneider killing, and conducting propaganda and economic warfare operations is established beyond reasonable dispute by the primary documentary record.

Did the CIA directly run the September 11, 1973 coup?

This is debated among historians. What is confirmed is that the CIA destabilised Allende's government over three years, conducted propaganda operations, facilitated economic pressure, and maintained regular contact with coup-minded Chilean military officers. Whether the CIA had operational advance knowledge of the specific date and provided direct direction for the September 11 coup itself — rather than the multi-year destabilisation that preceded it — is still debated. The Chilean military planned and executed the final assault; the CIA's three-year preparation of the political and military conditions is documented.

What happened to Henry Kissinger and Richard Helms?

Richard Helms was convicted of perjury in 1977 for lying to the US Senate about CIA activity in Chile. He received a two-year suspended sentence and a $2,000 fine — widely regarded as inadequate. Henry Kissinger was targeted by extradition requests from Spanish and French judges investigating Operation Condor; the US government refused extradition. Kissinger died in November 2023 without facing any judicial accountability.

Did Chile's own military and elites have independent motives for the coup?

Yes. Chilean copper-industry businesses, large landowners, professional associations, and significant parts of the Chilean middle class and military opposed Allende's nationalisation and land reform programmes independently of US pressure. The coup's architects — Pinochet, Air Force General Leigh, and others — were Chilean actors with their own institutional, ideological, and class interests. Attributing the coup entirely to US manipulation overstates CIA operational control and understates Chilean agency. The documented US role was primarily in destabilising conditions and facilitating the military contacts; the operational planning of September 11 was Chilean.

Where can I read the primary declassified documents?

The most comprehensive public collection is maintained by the National Security Archive at George Washington University through its Chile Documentation Project, led by Peter Kornbluh. The CIA's FOIA Reading Room contains the Family Jewels documents. The State Department's Foreign Relations of the United States (FRUS) volume on Chile 1969–1973 is available through the Office of the Historian at history.state.gov. The 1975 Church Committee report (Covert Action in Chile 1963-1973) is available through the Senate Intelligence Committee.

Sources

National Security Archive / Peter Kornbluh·Sep 2003·Peter Kornbluh
High Credibility
US Senate Select Committee on Intelligence·Dec 1975·US Senate Select Committee
High Credibility
US State Department (FRUS)·Jun 2014·US Department of State
High Credibility
High Credibility
CIA FOIA Reading Room·Jun 2007·CIA
High Credibility
Show 7 more sources
National Security Archive·Sep 2020·Peter Kornbluh
High Credibility
The New York Times·Sep 2000·Tim Weiner
High Credibility
Common Courage Press·Jan 1995·William Blum
Medium Credibility
The Washington Post·Nov 1977·Washington Post Staff
High Credibility
National Security Archive (CIA cable declassified)·Sep 1970·CIA Santiago Station
High Credibility
Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs·Sep 2021·Various
High Credibility

Further Reading

Primary Documents1

Alleged assassination plots involving foreign leaders : an interim report of the Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, United States Senate : together with additional, supplemental and separate viewsCongressional Report376 pp

Church Committee interim report (1975): Alleged Assassination Plots Involving Foreign Leaders — the Senate's official investigation of CIA plots, including the Schneider case in Chile.

Related Theories

Government & PoliticsDebunked
The Voting Pencil Fraud Myth
The recurring claim that polling stations hand out pencils so that the state, MI5, or a hidden 'establishment' can secretly rub out and rewrite votes. It is true that UK polling stations traditionally supply pencils and that voters may bring their own pen. But ballots are sealed, transported, and counted the same night under the direct scrutiny of candidates' agents and observers, no evidence of pencil-enabled vote-switching has ever been found, and election authorities across the UK, Canada, Australia and the US have repeatedly debunked the idea. Pencils are used for mundane practical reasons, not for tampering.
12 sources90% confidencefully sourced