Analysis

Project Blue Beam is unusual among conspiracy theories in that it has no serious evidence even at the level of internal plausibility. The technologies it describes — satellite-projected holograms visible globally in daylight, personalised telepathic audio transmissions, ELF-wave mind control — do not exist and are not achievable with any foreseeable physics.

Serge Monast and the 1994 Document

Monast was a Quebec-based journalist and evangelical Christian who had been involved in various anti-New World Order media projects in Canada in the early 1990s. His Blue Beam document was self-published and circulated within French-Canadian evangelical and conspiracy networks before finding a wider audience through early internet newsgroups in the mid-1990s.

The document describes a four-step program:

1. Manufactured earthquakes and archaeological discoveries at specific sites worldwide designed to shatter existing religious beliefs and prepare populations for new ones.
2. A sky show — a massive three-dimensional holographic display using satellites to project "Christ, Buddha, Krishna, Mohammed" figures globally, which then merge into a single "Antichrist" figure, claiming to be the return of each religion's messiah.
3. Telepathic two-way communications using ELF, VLF, and LF waves to simulate the voice of God inside each person's mind in their own language.
4. Supernatural manifestations via electronic technology to simulate alien invasions or raptures, inducing populations to accept world government protection.

Monast cited no sources, produced no documentation of any government program, and identified no named insiders. The document reads as speculative fiction elaborated with technical-sounding terminology.

Physical and Technical Impossibility

The central mechanism of Project Blue Beam — satellite-projected global holograms — is not physically achievable and would not be even with vastly more advanced technology than currently exists.

Holographic projection requires a medium. Conventional holography requires a photosensitive medium (film, glass, or a controlled air medium with suspended particles) to scatter and recombine light. Projecting a hologram visible to billions of people across the entire daylit sky would require an impossibly large and uniform medium across the Earth's entire atmosphere simultaneously. There is no physics mechanism by which satellites could produce this effect.

Scale and energy requirements. The energy required to illuminate a holographic image across the visible sky of an entire hemisphere in daylight conditions — competing with the luminosity of the Sun — would be orders of magnitude beyond any conceivable power source. No satellite array in existence or plausibly buildable could produce the required irradiance.

ELF/VLF "mind control." Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) and Very Low Frequency (VLF) electromagnetic waves are used in submarine communications due to their ability to penetrate seawater. They have no mechanism for transmitting intelligible language into individual human brains. The neurological architecture for language processing is not addressable by external electromagnetic signals in the way Monast describes.

No engineering footprint. A program of the described scope — global satellite constellation, holographic emitters, ELF transmitters, coordination across every government and military — would leave an enormous engineering, budgetary, procurement, and personnel footprint. No document, procurement record, whistleblower account, or leaked communication has ever surfaced suggesting its existence.

The Anti-Semitic Undercurrent

It is worth noting explicitly, as scholars of conspiracy theory have documented, that Project Blue Beam shares structural features with older antisemitic conspiracy theories about elite manipulation of religion and world events. Monast's document invokes the Protocols-era framework of a cosmopolitan elite engineering a false messiah to subvert true Christian faith. This framing is not central to every presentation of Blue Beam in contemporary internet culture — the theory has been absorbed by a wider conspiracy ecosystem that de-emphasises its origins — but its genealogy is traceable to this tradition, and readers should be aware of it.

Why Blue Beam Persists

Several properties sustain Blue Beam despite its complete lack of evidential basis:

• It is unfalsifiable as normally presented. Any failure of the predicted events to materialise can be attributed to the plan not yet having been activated, rather than to the plan not existing.
• It resonates with genuine religious anxieties. End-times theology has deep roots in evangelical Christianity; Blue Beam maps onto existing eschatological frameworks about false messiahs and world government.
• Technological vocabulary lends plausibility. The use of real technical terms — ELF waves, Project Blue Book (a genuine declassified USAF UFO investigation program with a similar name) — gives the theory a surface appearance of groundedness.
• Monast's death. His 1996 death from cardiac arrest was interpreted by believers as assassination, creating a martyrdom narrative that made questioning the theory seem callous or complicit.

Real Holographic Technology

There are genuine applications of holographic and volumetric display technology — Tupac Shakur's 2012 "hologram" at Coachella (actually a Pepper's Ghost optical illusion), Gorillaz concert visuals, military simulation systems. None of these scales to global sky projection, none is classified, and none involves NASA or UN coordination. The gap between real holographic technology and the Project Blue Beam scenario is not a matter of degree — it is a categorical physical impossibility.

What Holographic Atmospheric Projection Actually Requires

A useful exercise is to ask what the claim would actually require. Project Blue Beam describes a sky-wide holographic projection visible across continents and to billions of observers simultaneously. The optics rule that out before any engineering question is reached. Light scattered from a true volumetric hologram — the kind Monast describes, with three-dimensional figures appearing in open atmosphere — would require either coherent illumination of cubic kilometres of clear air, which violates basic atmospheric scattering physics, or an array of orbital projectors whose aperture and power demands exceed every space-based platform ever launched by several orders of magnitude. Real "sky writing" today still relies on either chemical contrails from low-altitude aircraft or millions of coordinated drones at kilometre-scale, both of which are visible only locally and only at night. The gap between Monast's claimed capability and any existing or near-future technology is not a matter of secrecy; it is a matter of physics that no level of classified budget can paper over.

Takeaway

Project Blue Beam rests on a single uncorroborated 1994 pamphlet by a conspiracy theorist with no identified sources, proposes mechanisms that are physically impossible under known physics, and has produced zero material evidence of any government program in the three decades since it was written. It belongs to the genre of technologically-flavoured eschatological conspiracy — theories that graft end-times religious anxiety onto fears of elite technological control. Engaging with it critically is worthwhile precisely because its persistence demonstrates how far an internally incoherent claim can travel when it resonates with pre-existing fears.