The Ahmadi Religion of Peace and Light (AROPL): Cult Allegations

Introduction

The Ahmadi Religion of Peace and Light, abbreviated AROPL, is a small new religious movement led by Abdullah Hashem Aba Al-Sadiq, an Egyptian-born former filmmaker. Followers regard Hashem as the Qa''im — a successor figure in a lineage of Mahdi-claimants beginning with Ahmed Al-Hassan, who in the early 2000s in Iraq announced himself as the Mahdi (the prophesied final figure in Islamic eschatology). AROPL has small but international membership, operates a substantial online presence, and has invested in physical sites including a property in the Republic of Ireland.

Multiple ex-members and several mainstream journalists have characterised AROPL as a cult. The allegations include high-control behavioural rules, restrictions on ex-member contact with current members, tiered financial commitment, leader-devotion language, and serious sexual-misconduct allegations against figures in the leadership. AROPL has issued public denials and the organisation continues to operate.

This page treats the cult-allegation framing analytically. Allegations against named individuals are described as allegations attributed to named outlets and ex-member testimony; nothing here should be read as an adjudicated finding.

Important distinction: AROPL is unrelated to the mainstream Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, an established religious community founded by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad in 1889 with millions of members worldwide. The two share a syllable in their name; they share no organisational, theological, or historical lineage. The Ahmadiyya Muslim Community has objected publicly to AROPL''s adoption of similar nomenclature.

Origins

The lineage AROPL claims begins with Ahmed Al-Hassan Al-Yamani, who in approximately 2000–2002 in Iraq presented himself as the Mahdi and the rightful successor to the Twelfth Imam. He gathered a small following in southern Iraq, particularly Najaf and Basra. His group, sometimes called the Ansar Al-Mahdi or "Followers of the Mahdi," remained on the fringe of Iraqi Shia Islam and was rejected by mainstream Shia clerical authorities including the Najaf hawza.

Abdullah Hashem Aba Al-Sadiq emerged in the late 2010s as a successor claimant. Hashem had previously been known online as a documentary filmmaker producing material on Freemasonry and the Illuminati, and operated YouTube channels under various names. By around 2015, he was presenting himself as the Qa''im — the next figure in the prophetic lineage after Ahmed Al-Hassan — and the AROPL movement under that name took shape, eventually rebranding around 2020 to its current English name. The organisation acquired a property in County Tipperary, Ireland in 2021 to serve as a community hub.

Cult Indicators

Researchers including Steven Hassan (BITE model author) and Janja Lalich (academic cult studies) have applied standard cultic-studies frameworks to AROPL based on ex-member testimony. The reported patterns include:

• Behaviour control — prescribed prayer and dress patterns; restrictions on contact with non-AROPL family members; expectations about geographic relocation to community properties
• Information control — discouragement of mainstream media coverage; framing of critics as agents of evil; control of which lectures, books, and online materials members consume
• Thought control — repeated content patterns; thought-terminating phrases tied to obedience to the Qa''im; framing of doubt as spiritual failing
• Emotional control — shame, guilt, and exclusion threats; ritualised devotional language addressing the leader

These reports are corroborated across multiple independent ex-member accounts (the YouTube channel TellTale features extensive interviews) and have been documented in BBC, Religion News Service, Premier Christian News, and Vice reporting between 2020 and 2024.

Leadership Allegations

Beginning around 2021, ex-member testimony — initially via the TellTale channel and subsequently picked up by mainstream outlets — has alleged sexual misconduct by figures in or close to AROPL''s leadership. The allegations include claims of coerced relationships, manipulation of vulnerable members, and pressure to report incidents internally rather than to law enforcement. AROPL has denied these allegations publicly and through legal correspondence.

Some former members have brought their accounts to police in the United Kingdom and Ireland. As of mid-2025, no criminal charges arising specifically from AROPL allegations have been brought against the named figures. This page describes the allegations strictly as allegations.

AROPL''s Response

AROPL operates a public website, social-media accounts, and a YouTube presence. The organisation has issued statements rejecting the cult characterisation and the misconduct allegations. AROPL describes itself as a peaceful religious community and characterises ex-member critics as motivated by personal grievance or external influence. Members continue to attend community events and produce content publicly.

Why the Verdict Is "Partially True"

Multiple lines of corroborated ex-member testimony and journalistic investigation document patterns associated with high-control religious movements. Some elements — particularly leader-devotion language, information-control patterns, and tiered membership — are well-documented. Other claims — particularly the most serious allegations against named individuals — remain contested and unadjudicated. The "cult" label itself is contested terminology for any new religious movement, and academic religious-studies researchers vary in whether they apply it.

The verdict reflects: documented cult-like operational patterns are real; the most serious specific allegations are alleged but not adjudicated; AROPL''s denials and continued operation are also real.

What Would Change Our Verdict

• Adjudicated outcomes (criminal or civil) of any of the specific allegations
• Substantial recantation by multiple lead ex-member voices
• Independent academic religious-studies consensus on classification

Verdict

Partially true. Cult-like operational dynamics are documented across multiple independent sources. Specific serious allegations against named figures are alleged but unadjudicated and disputed by AROPL. The "cult" framing is partly accurate as a description of the operation; full confirmation awaits further investigation and any judicial findings.