Fact check
Is it true: Gaddafi/Libya NATO intervention regime-change scope creep (Mar-Oct 2011)?
Partly — it's more complicated than the claim suggests.
UNSCR 1973 authorised civilian protection and a no-fly zone, not regime change. Russia and China formally protested that NATO's Operation Unified Protector exceeded the mandate. The 2016 UK House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee inquiry found the intervention lacked a coherent post-Gaddafi strategy and produced political collapse. Clinton's "we came, we saw, he died" remark and her emails document regime-change framing. The scope-creep claim is substantially supported; the claim that assassination was secretly planned from the outset is not established.
The claim
UN Security Council Resolution 1973 (March 2011) authorised all necessary measures to protect Libyan civilians and established a no-fly zone. NATO's Operation Unified Protector was subsequently critic
Key evidence
UNSCR 1973 did not authorise regime change — Russia and China protested
No document establishes pre-planned assassination from before UNSCR 1973
Conspirafy steelmans each claim, then follows the evidence. How we reach a verdict · Check another claim