Skip to main content

Browse Conspiracy Theories

19 theories - partially true

Government & PoliticsPartially True
South Korea Sewol Ferry 2014: Cover-Up of Government Response Failures
On April 16, 2014, the MV Sewol capsized off Jindo Island, South Korea, killing 304 people — 250 of them high school students from Danwon High School on a class trip to Jeju Island. The immediate causes were documented: cargo overloaded to three times the legal limit, illegal vessel modifications that reduced stability, crew incompetence, and an instruction to passengers to stay in place rather than evacuate. Captain Lee Jun-seok abandoned ship and was later convicted of murder. The conspiracy claim at issue is not about the sinking itself but about the government's response: the Park Geun-hye administration's delayed and disorganised rescue operation, her unaccounted-for seven-hour absence during the crisis, and subsequent pressure on media to downplay criticism were confirmed by a 2017 Special Investigation Commission established after Park's impeachment. Park was impeached and convicted partly over Sewol-related conduct. A more extreme framing — that the Park administration deliberately sank the Sewol — is not supported by evidence.
15 sources78% confidencefully sourced
Health & MedicinePartially True
RFK Jr HHS "Vaccine Vault" Claims
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., confirmed as US Secretary of Health and Human Services in February 2025, has made recurring claims that the federal government possesses hidden or suppressed adverse-event data about vaccines — sometimes described as a "vault" of concealed CDC or FDA data that would, if released, reveal a broader pattern of vaccine harm than is publicly known. The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is and has long been publicly accessible at vaers.hhs.gov. CDC publishes its vaccine-safety surveillance data through multiple public platforms. HHS and CDC maintain no publicly-disclosed "vault" of suppressed adverse-event data. Specific datasets RFK Jr has cited — including autism-prevalence breakdowns and alleged internal safety signal analyses — are either publicly available or have not been produced as documentary evidence of suppression. The claim that a discoverable vault of hidden data exists is unsubstantiated; questions about specific data granularity and research transparency at federal agencies are a legitimate ongoing policy debate.
16 sources80% confidencefully sourced
Health & MedicinePartially True
Trans Youth Care Suppression Claims
Two opposing suppression narratives circulate about pediatric gender-affirming care. The first holds that established, evidence-based care is being suppressed by transphobic state legislation (partially supported: more than 20 US states have enacted restrictions or bans since 2021). The second holds that the evidence base for pediatric transition interventions is itself weaker than advocacy bodies have claimed, and that clinicians and medical associations have suppressed this uncertainty (partially supported: the UK's independent Cass Review, published April 2024, found the evidence base "remarkably weak" and recommended a more cautious, individualized approach). This is a contested, ongoing medical-evidence debate with real factual stakes on multiple sides.
23 sources65% confidencefully sourced
Government & PoliticsPartially True
Scientology: Disconnection and the 1993 IRS Tax-Exempt Deal
Two distinct documented patterns are examined here. First, disconnection: the Church of Scientology's documented practice of requiring members to sever contact with family members and friends who are critical of the Church or have left it. This practice is attested by court testimony, regulatory findings, and named ex-members including Mike Rinder, Leah Remini, and Paul Haggis. Second, the 1993 IRS settlement granting the Church tax-exempt status after a prolonged campaign against IRS officials that the Church described as litigation; the settlement's terms were not made public, which has sustained a "secret deal" conspiracy framing. Both patterns are documented; the contested element is whether the IRS settlement constituted improper back-door dealing rather than normal legal resolution.
12 sources72% confidencefully sourced